Filing FIR Against Ajit Anjum Undermines Role of Free Media: Advocate Irshad Ahmad
New Delhi: Advocate Irshad Ahmad expressd, unequivocal support for senior journalist Ajit Anjum, who is currently facing unwarranted harassment simply for performing his professional duty. The recent complaint and FIR filed against him by a complaint of BLO (Booth Level Officer) in Begusarai are deeply concerning, not only as an attack on his personal integrity but as a threat to journalistic freedom and the very right of the public to stay informed.
Ajit Anjum made a conscious and courageous shift to independent journalism, leveraging platforms like YouTube to reach audiences directly. In doing so, he has amplified the voices of the marginalized, the poor, and those forgotten by the mainstream, single-handedly taking voter awareness and grassroots issues to millions. His reports are marked not just by their reach but by an integrity and fairness that rarely find space in today’s era of paid news and sensationalism. His sharp critiques of biased journalism and efforts to foster dialogue across social media have become an inspiration for a generation of young journalists seeking purpose and truth in their work.
Advocate Irshad Ahmad emphasized that the role of the media especially voices like Anjum is critical during elections. Their presence on the ground ensures transparency, accountability, and an informed electorate cornerstones of any healthy democracy. By interacting openly with voters, documenting the on-ground realities in rural Bihar, and objectively questioning both the administration and political actors, Ajit Anjum is simply fulfilling a duty assigned to journalists by the Indian Constitution and recognized across democratic societies worldwide. At no stage has he interfered with the lawful functions of any government employee. Reporting live from the field, observing the polling process, and seeking citizens’ opinions are inherent components of journalistic work during election time.
Advocate Irshad Ahmad said that criminal complaints and FIRs against such journalistic activity sets a dangerous precedent. Instead of interpreting his ground reporting as interference, officials should recognize its value in strengthening faith in the democratic process. By scrutinizing public processes and engaging directly with voters, journalists like Ajit Anjum help identify administrative gaps, highlight malpractices if any, and offer constructive feedback for improvement. This process not only assists voters in making informed choices but also helps the administration by drawing attention to issues that may otherwise go unnoticed.
We stand with Ajit Anjum, with the principles of free expression and truth, and with every journalist in this country who refuses to be silenced in the face of adversity. We appeal that the FIR against him be withdrawn, and that his right—and the right of all journalists—to report independently be protected without hesitation or compromise.
Advocate Irshad Ahmad emphasized that media remain the vigilant, compassionate, and fearless voice for all. Let democracy be strengthened by the diversity of opinions and the courage to pursue truth, no matter how inconvenient. And let us all remember: the real power of journalism lies not in echoing those already heard, but in illuminating the struggles and hopes of those left in the shadows.
